What is a key downside of the Design-Bid-Build method compared to others?

The Design-Bid-Build method is a traditional project delivery system where the design and construction phases are separated. One of its key downsides is that it often takes longer than other methods, such as Design-Build. This increased duration can be attributed to the sequential nature of the process, where the design must be completed before construction can begin. After the design is finalized, the project is then put out to bid, which can add additional time as contractors prepare their proposals and the selection process occurs.

In contrast, methods like Design-Build integrate both design and construction phases, allowing for overlapping schedules that can significantly reduce the overall project timeline. By combining these phases, the design-builder can begin construction while the design is still being finalized, which streamlines the overall process.

The other options do not accurately reflect the characteristics of the Design-Bid-Build method. While it does provide a level of cost certainty through a guaranteed price after the bidding phase, this certainty does not negate the potential for extended timelines. The statement about eliminating the need for documentation is incorrect, as comprehensive documentation is crucial in this method for clear communication and legal purposes. Lastly, the need for specialized contractors remains; however, Design-Bid-Build does not inherently require fewer specialized contractors